When Apple first announced its wearable device in 2014, many people were surprised to learn that it was not going to be called the iWatch. Instead, the company had opted for the name Apple Watch. This decision was significant, given that the i-prefix has been a staple of Apple’s product naming convention for over a decade, including the iPhone, iPad, iPod, and iMac.
In this article, I’ll explain the reasons why Apple did not choose to use the iWatch name for its wearable device, despite the popularity and familiarity of the i-prefix.
One of the most significant reasons for Apple’s decision not to use the iWatch name was due to trademark issues. At the time, a number of companies, including Swiss watchmaker Swatch, had already registered trademarks for the name iWatch in various countries around the world. This meant that Apple would have had to negotiate with these companies or risk facing legal action if it used the name iWatch.
According to a report by Bloomberg in 2014, Swatch had registered the iSwatch trademark in Switzerland, and had also applied for the iWatch trademark in the United States, Japan, and other countries. Swatch’s CEO, Nick Hayek, had also stated in an interview with a Swiss newspaper that he was prepared to take legal action to protect his company’s trademarks.
Given the legal complexity and potential risks involved, Apple likely decided it was not worth the effort or the cost to try to negotiate with Swatch or other companies to obtain the iWatch trademark. Instead, the company chose a new name for its wearable device that it could own and control.
Another reason why Apple did not choose to use the iWatch name may have been because it wanted to create a new brand extension that was distinct from its existing product lines. While the i-prefix has been used for a range of Apple products over the years, including the iPhone, iPad, and iPod, these devices all share similar characteristics and are part of a broader ecosystem of Apple products and services.
The Apple Watch, on the other hand, represents a new product category for the company, one that is focused specifically on health and fitness tracking, as well as communications and mobile computing. By choosing a new name for the device, Apple was able to position the Apple Watch as a separate and distinct product, with its own unique identity and features.
Another factor that may have influenced Apple’s decision not to use the iWatch name was product positioning. Apple has always been very deliberate about the way it positions its products in the market, and the company likely wanted to ensure that the Apple Watch was positioned in a way that was consistent with its intended target audience and use cases.
According to a report by The Verge in 2014, Apple’s marketing team had spent a significant amount of time and resources researching the wearable device market and identifying the key use cases and user personas that the Apple Watch was designed for. The team then used this research to develop a marketing strategy and positioning for the product that was tailored to these specific use cases and user personas.
By choosing a new name for the device, Apple was able to position the Apple Watch as a premium, high-end product that was focused on health and fitness tracking, communication, and mobile computing. This positioning was consistent with the intended target audience for the device, which was primarily health and fitness enthusiasts, tech-savvy consumers, and early adopters.
Another reason why Apple may have chosen not to use the iWatch name was because the company was undergoing a cultural shift at the time. In 2014, Tim Cook had been CEO of Apple for just a few years, and the company was still coming to terms with the loss of its iconic founder, Steve Jobs. Cook had already begun to make changes to the company’s culture, including a greater emphasis on social responsibility and diversity, as well as a more collaborative approach to product development and decision-making.
The decision not to use the iWatch name may have been part of this cultural shift, as Apple sought to move away from the image of a company that was focused solely on creating and selling trendy, must-have gadgets, and towards a more mature and responsible brand that was focused on delivering innovative products and services that had a positive impact on people’s lives.
By choosing a new name for its wearable device, Apple was able to signal that it was moving in a new direction, one that was less focused on style and fashion, and more focused on function and purpose. The name Apple Watch represented this shift, as it conveyed a sense of purpose and utility, rather than just a trendy accessory.
In conclusion, there were several reasons why Apple did not choose to use the iWatch name for its wearable device. These included trademark issues, the desire to create a new brand extension, product positioning, and a cultural shift within the company. Ultimately, the decision to choose the name Apple Watch was a deliberate and strategic move that helped to position the device as a premium, high-end product that was focused on health and fitness tracking, communication, and mobile computing. Today, the Apple Watch is one of the most popular and iconic wearable devices on the market, and its name has become synonymous with innovation, style, and purpose.
Leave a Comment